Lets look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and builtin disk file site
Let's consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to something that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it's a company.
It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage plus the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the answer.
The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, so the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.
웹하드 순위 It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files on the internet at a set monthly cost. This means that the use of web hard has become common.
But it's not just lately that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company refuses to adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Because of this, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one in line with the reality and needs.
