Lets look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and builtin webhard
Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it's a company.
It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
p2p 순위 Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the thought of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the perfect solution is.
The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.
It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files on the internet at a fixed monthly cost. This means that the application of web hard has become common.
But it's not just recently that this concept came out, and it's true that it's been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't join it or even paid for their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.
The biggest background of this phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one in line with the reality and needs.
